Nathula is safe, People are safe but media stupidity can make situation “alarming”
D. Bishal
19 Sep, VoiceofSikkim: India that was in 1962 is not now in 2009, both the nations are equally responsible and growing economic giants in Asia. Even in the period of Global economy melt down these are the two countries that stood like a barrier confronting every maze of difficulties during recession period and even now and then. It is evident that both the countries have very close cultural relation ever since during medieval period.
Today it seems like someone do not want to see the friendly tie between India and China so that such biased issues are fired continuously making media as master key. Chinese incursion hardly be envisaged but those are not up to an unavoidable limit. The fractal reports usually occurs in border like LAC Line of Control, Sikkim (Nathula), Arunachal Pradesh which too cannot be ignored after all there are soldiers guarding on both the side with different thoughts and mind set in such a harsh climate. Government is continuously monitoring the mobility of any objects on its border with hi-tech surveillance gadgets and satellites, then how can a media be so arrogant compiling a data on blind shots?
I do not understand but one thing media should retain it’s credibility in terms of national security issues.
I request to all media once again and on top of it I pledge to national visual media on them this issue has turned somehow like “hysteria” .
उत्तर सिक्किमको केरसाङमा गोली हानहान भारतीय सेना घाइते
INDO-TIBETAN PATROL: Chinese soldier patrolling the Sikkim border.India and China reached an agreement in 1996 in which both sides pledged not to open fire for any reason. (Photo taken on July 10, 2008.) (DIPTENDU DUTTA/AFP/Getty Images)
New Delhi, Sep 16 (IANS) The Indian Army is replenishing its forward posts along the frontier with China in Jammu and Kashmir and the northeast, officials said Wednesday, adding this was an annual exercise.
'This is an annual exercise, named Operation Alert, that we conduct every year to replenish our forward posts along our borders with China before the winter and nothing more should be read into it,' a senior Indian Army officer told IANS.
'It has nothing to do with the reports of border skirmishes, which, in any case, the government has officially denied,' the officer added.
'There has been no mobilization beyond the routine activities that we normally carry on at this time of the year,' the officer said.
In the past months, there have been several reports of Chinese troops intruding into Indian territory in the Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir creating anxiety about Beijing's aggressive designs.
The Indian government has, however, sought to play down the incursions, saying these are routine incidents that occur due to differences in perception about the Line of Actual Control.
China has officially denied its troops have intruded into Indian territory.
The Indian Army officer also pointed out that the force's activities had little to do with the just-concluded high-profile war game conducted by the Chinese Army in which close to 50,000 troops had been deployed in a cross-country tactical mobilisation that was seen as Beijing's efforts to improve its ability to move troops to Tibet whenever reinforcements were required.
There are two other objectives of strategic importance -- One is to push the Chinese border as far as possible into India and second is to bring the Chinese army as close to the Indian land route as possible, making Ladakh vulnerable by cutting its south eastern side from the rest of India. It is something like what Pakistan tried to do in Kargil in 1999 -- cutting off the land route to Kashmir. China has started incursions along the border with Sikkim. The “Finger Point” area where Chinese troops are probing is of military importance to both sides, though it is within the borders of Sikkim and Tibet. Although the Chinese have made a pretence of accepting Sikkim as part of Indian territory during Prime Minister Vajpayee’s visit to China in 2003, they never actually did. Prime Minister Vajpayee and the Indian Government fell for the trick that if India fully recognized Tibet as a part of China, the latter would accord recognition to India’s sovereignty over Sikkim. India did sign on the Tibet issue, but China did not honour its end of the bargain on Sikkim. China gave an impression that there was no border dispute insofar as Sikkim is concerned. The Sikkim issue is a pressure tactic and has the potential of becoming a burning issue further. To open new pockets of contention is a dangerous move by Beijing. In the eastern sector, China’s claim of 90,000 square kilometers of territory, that is the entire state of Arunachal Pradesh, can be used by it to keep boundary and territorial disputes with India alive, and take it into the international arena. This is what Beijing exactly did when trying to block an Asian Development Bank (ADB) loan to India for development work in Arunachal Pradesh. New Delhi has made it abundantly clear that Arunachal Pradesh is Indian Territory and non-negotiable. Small adjustments, however, can be made along the border without disturbing the settled population. The 2005 India-China agreement on modalities to resolve the boundary issue has a clause that settled populations would not be disturbed. Although the agreement was jointly formulated, the Chinese are reneging on the clause.
No comments:
Post a Comment