| Flanked by gun-wielding and masked Maoists, officer-in-charge Atindranath Dutta (in spectacles) minutes before his release on Thursday evening in the Bhulagera forests of Lalgarh. A Maoist poster hung from his neck says ‘P.O.W. juddha bandir mukti sammelan (a meeting to release the prisoner of war)’. Picture by Samir Mondal |
TT, Oct. 22: The Maoists released Sankrail officer-in-charge Atindranath Dutta around 8 tonight at Bhulagera forest village in Lalgarh after striking a deal with the state government that allows 14 jailed tribal women to walk free. After 54 hours in captivity, Dutta was led to a gathering of journalists and lawyers at Bhulagera primary school, a white paper inscribed with the words PoW (prisoner of war) pasted on a piece of red cloth hung from his neck. “I wasn’t worried about myself; I was concerned about my parents, daughter and wife,” Dutta told the media, whom the Maoists had called for the hand-over after the government promised the rebels safe passage under the deal. Maoist leader Kishanji, his face covered like all the guerrillas’, ceremonially removed the red cloth from Dutta’s neck. “You are being released…. It is up to you whether you will continue to remain with the police, but don’t commit atrocities on poor people,” he said. The OC left with the journalists, walking 2km to the metalled road where the media’s cars were waiting. He was handed over to police at Jhargram town, 25km from Bhulagera, and will reach Calcutta tomorrow. Dutta’s wife Indrani said in Calcutta: “I can’t describe how relieved I am. But I shall feel sure of his release only when I see him with my own eyes, I guess.” Kishanji said the release had been delayed because early this morning, the joint forces encircled part of the Punnapani forest near Dharampur adjoining Lalgarh and appeared to be shooting at what they thought might be rebel hideouts. “I wanted to release OC babu earlier, but with the police beginning their operations, the process has been delayed,” Kishanji had said in the morning. “Unless the forces stop their operations and remain confined to their camps for the next 24 hours, we will not take responsibility for OC babu’s life.” The firing stopped soon, but government sources suggested Kishanji had no intention of releasing Dutta so early and had all along planned to do so after sunset to avoid being attacked after the release. “The Maoists had made it clear they would release Dutta only after the judge granted the Adivasi women bail, which he did in the afternoon,” the officer said. In keeping with the deal, the government did not oppose the bail petition of the women who had been arrested on September 22 for allegedly attacking the police. They will be freed tomorrow after formalities are complete. The deal was struck after Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee said yesterday afternoon that a “negotiation and settlement’’ was needed with the “kidnappers’’. The government decided to contact the Maoists through “unofficial channels”. A source said: “If any harm came to the officer, the state’s image would have taken a beating.” A senior inspector-general got in touch with an aide of Kishanji with help from an officer of West Midnapore police around 8pm. The rebels had initially asked for the release of Lalgarh leader Chhatradhar Mahato, withdrawal of the joint forces from Lalgarh and bail for the women. But the government rejected the first two demands and the Maoists quickly climbed down under pressure. “The women were not hardened terrorists, just supporters of Mahato’s (People’s) Committee,” an officer said. “Although their release is a huge victory for the Maoists — as they will be seen to be with the tribals, fighting for their cause — the government’s message that for every policeman killed, 25 Maoists would be killed had also sunk in.” It was to keep up this pressure that the morning offensive at Punnapani was launched. “The idea was to zero in on their base… to send the message that if they didn’t release the OC even after the (women got bail), the forces would attack their hideout and kill or arrest several of them,’’ a source said. Dutta said he was told past midnight “that I might be released today”. The OC, who was in the same off-white T-shirt and trousers that he wore when he was taken hostage on Tuesday afternoon, said he had been shifted frequently. “The Maoists were initially aggressive but later they co-operated with me.” | Atindranath’s wife Indrani after his release. (Amit Datta) |
Refusing to elaborate on the deal, chief secretary Asok Mohan Chakrabarti said: “We tried all possible ways to get him (Dutta) released and eventually that fetched results.’’ Director-general of police Bhupinder Singh said: “I am not concerned about the means or whether our government reacted at gunpoint. I only know the results.” He, however, indicated this was not the end of the anti-Maoist offensive: “We are certainly not into Gandhian philosophy.” The DGP also said that bail for the tribal women did not mean action against them would cease for ever. “Bail doesn’t prove their innocence. We will frame chargesheets and submit them in court. Then it is for the court to decide whether the accused will be punished,” he added. Kishanji said it was a “great victory” for the people of Lalgarh. “This is the first time that we have released a PoW,” he said.
HOME-COMING ~ Mr Atindranath Dutta, with a placard reading `Prisoner of War`, being set free on Thursday.- SUPROMIT MAITY, SNSTale of co-operation, watched by captors Forest freedom from Kishanji | | Kishanji takes off the PoW label stuck on the police officer. (Amit Datta and Samir Mondal) |
TT, Oct. 22: His Maoist abductors lined up behind him, faces covered and guns slung on their backs, Atindranath Dutta spoke about his “co-operative” captors after CPI (Maoist) leader Kishanji released him before cameras in a West Midnapore forest. “I feel relieved. I want to tell my family that there is nothing to worry about,” said the Sankrail officer-in-charge after over 50 hours in Maoist captivity. Standing before journalists at Bhulagera in Lalgarh, about 30km from Jhargram, the officer recounted the kidnap, stay and release, often referring to the Maoists as onara —a term of respect generally used while speaking about elders. Before the interview started, Kishanji took off a red cloth that was hung from the officer’s neck with a paper stuck on it, saying: “Juddha bandir mukti sammelan (a meeting to release a prisoner of war).” Recounting Tuesday’s kidnap, Atindranath said: “I was not at the police station during the incident (when bike-borne Maoists attacked the police station) but I heard gunshots. I was returning to the police station after lunch at my quarters when a woman pointed a 9mm pistol at me. Before I could react, others blindfolded me and put me on a motorcycle and drove me to their den.” He said: “Initially, they were aggressive but when I reached their den blindfolded, they became co-operative. No one tortured me. No one told me why I was kidnapped but I heard from those who captured me that they have demanded release of some women.” Asked about his stay, he said: “I ate whatever they ate. They gave me rice, dal, vegetables and puffed rice.” Did he know where he had been kept? “I was with them but I am not sure where I was. In captivity I was taken to several locations,” Atindranath said. After over 50 hours with the Maoists, had his attitude towards them changed? The officer again said the Maoists had been “co-operative”, then added, “but I cannot predict how much aggressive they will become later”. “I want to say that the government should think about development in tribal areas. I will tell the government to sit for talks with the Maoists.” Asked about his area of operation — Sankrail — the officer said the Maoists were not so active in the area but at the same time “security was inadequate”. Would he continue as a police officer? The officer said he would take a call after talking to his family. When his slain colleagues, sub-inspectors Dibakar Bhattacharya and Swapan Roy, were mentioned, Atindranath said he was sad that they had been killed. “I feel deeply sad for the death of my two colleagues. I worked with them for so long. They were very co-operative,” he said. Earlier in the evening, speaking to his wife Indrani through STAR Ananda, Atindranath said he was safe and in good health. “I will return tonight. But I will have to go to Jhargram police station first to report there.” Indrani then gave the cellphone to their two-year-old daughter Oindrakshi but the line got disconnected. After the line was reconnected, Atindranath told his family: “I know you are anxious about me. I will return soon.” Late at night, he set off from Jhargram for Calcutta. Women who ‘liberated’ OC | NARESH JANA, TT, Midnapore, Oct. 22: The government had opposed bail to the 14 Lalgarh women, whose release order won officer Atindranath Dutta his freedom today, though police have not been able to gather enough evidence against the accused. Chandicharan Mahapatra, the public prosecutor in the Midnapore sessions court, said: “We didn’t oppose the bail because the police could not produce enough evidence .” The women had been charged with rioting with arms and deadly weapons, preventing government servants from performing their duty, attempt to murder, waging a war against the state, raising funds and planning for such acts, sedition, the arms act and unlawful assembly. All the charges, except that of unlawful assembly, are non-bailable. A source in the court said: “The police could not give an adequate injury report to prove that they were attacked with deadly weapons.” The court also gave bail to seven men arrested on similar charges in Salboni. Their release was not part of the swap. If somebody is charged under a bailable section, the police station concerned has the authority to release the accused on a personal recognition bond. In a case of non-bailable offence, the accused has to be produced in court within 24 hours of arrest and the judge decides if bail should be given. If the police are unable to file a chargesheet within 90 days of arrest, the accused gets bail. The 14 women, aged between 20 and 40, were granted bail on a bond of Rs 2,000 each. The order for their release was sent to the additional chief judicial magistrate’s court in Jhargram today. The women and one man, arrested with them, would be freed tomorrow from Midnapore Central Jail. Today was the scheduled hearing of the bail petition that the government told its lawyers not to oppose. Suman Das Mahapatra, public prosecutor in the Jhargram court where the case was first heard, said: “The arrested women and the man directly helped the Maoists by attacking the police. That is why we had opposed the bail.” On September 3, security forces had arrested the 15 after an alleged attack on the personnel at Tashebandh in Lalgarh. An officer said the police had gone to raid the village with information that Maoists injured in an encounter on September 2 were hiding there. “When the security forces reached Tashebandh, a large number of villagers circled them. They were armed with bows and arrows, knives, choppers, bamboo sticks and pipe guns. They attacked us using the women as a shield. The police then raided Tashebandh and Bansber and arrested the 15,” said a police officer. Police protest Over 200 policemen today protested in front of West Midnapore police superintendent Manoj Verma’s office alleging the government was not bothered about two constables abducted by Maoists but released 15 people to get an OC freed. “The government went out of its way to get Atindranath Dutta released but has done nothing for Kanchan Gorai and Sabir Mollah, abducted in Lalgarh on July 30,” said a policeman . Sabir’s mother Jahanara Bibi has said she would speak to Kishanji for his release. |
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment