2nd Day of the Indefinite fasting by members of JSTO, GPTO and others in Kalimpong Pix: Samiran Paul

Telangana Does not mean new States everywhere-Pranab

Kolkata, Dec 12 (IANS): With the rising clamour of statehood demands from other parts of the country, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said Saturday that the nod for Telangana did not mean that new states would be created everywhere.

Answering queries from reporters at a function in North 24 Parganas district, Mukherjee said the demand for Telangana was old and it 'does not mean that everywhere new states are to be created'.

He said Home Minister P. Chidambaram had indicated that there were several stages leading to formation of a state, and in the case of Telangana, developments were at a preliminary stage.

Mukherjee's response comes amid a flurry of statehood demands from across the country.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati Friday demanded that her state be trifurcated into Bundelkhand and Harit Pradesh for better governance. She said she has written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on the issue.

The centre's decision to start the process of forming Telangana has stoked the dormant demands for statehood across the country, including Vidarbha, Gorkhaland, Bodoland, Harit Pradesh, Bundelkhand and Purvanchal.

While Rashtriya Lok Dal leader Ajit Singh has renewed his demand for Harit Pradesh, Congress MP Vilas Muttemwar has revived the demand for carving Vidarbha out of Maharashtra.

Faced with the growing clamour for new states, the Congress Friday accepted that lack of development in a region could be a reason for the demand for smaller states, but stressed that the party was against demands for new states being made for 'political adjustment of leaders'.

Congress spokesman Shakeel Ahmed also admitted that the rising demand for new states had increased the difficulties for the government, but said it would respond with a cool mind.

Chamling refuses to get drawn to Gorkhaland Issues

Gangtok, Dec 12 Sikkim Chief Minister Pawan Kumar Chamling today evaded questions on Gorkhaland's statehood demand and Gorkha Janamukti Morcha's (GJM) call for 96-hour shut down from December 14 on the issue.

"I have no comments to offer," he told mediapersons on political developments in Darjeeling Hills and adjoining areas following the Centre's nod to a new Telegana state.

 "I will not say anything," Chamling said, when asked on the likely impact on traffic on NH-31A if the GJM went ahead with its shut down to press for its demand.

 Chamling had been vocal in the past on disruption of traffic on the sole highway connecting Sikkim with the rest of the country due to political agitation in Darjeeling Hills.

He had slammed both Centre and GJM for disruption of normal life in Sikkim due to frequent strikes on the statehood issue.

Development Council for Gorkha along with  9 State communities

Nanda Kirati Dewan :GUWAHATI, Dec 10 – The State Cabinet today decided to set up special development councils for ensuring all-round development of nine communities of the State. Official sources said that the communities to benefit from this decision are – Gorkha, Koch Rajbongshi, Ahom, Moran, Mottock, Chutia, Tea Tribes, Plains Karbis, Sarania-Kachari. 

It may be mentioned that six of these communities have been agitating for Scheduled Tribe status. Meanwhile, the Plains Karbi community is not enjoying the ST status being enjoyed by the Karbis of Karbi Anglong.

By another resolution, the Cabinet chaired by Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi decided to regularise the posts of school teachers appointed under the ‘Operation Black Board’ scheme. Sources said at present around 7,000 teachers are working under the OBB scheme.

The Cabinet also decided to reconstitute the NC Hills Autonomous Council. However, the modalities of the reconstitution are yet to be finalised. The final decision is expected after the new State Governor takes over.

Maoists demand autonomy for three West Bengal districts

PTI, Kolkata, 12 December : A demand for autonomy for three tribal-dominated districts of West Midnapore, Bankura and Purulia in West Bengal was today made by a top Maoist leader, who also justified the Gorkhaland statehood issue.

"We demand autonomy for the three districts on the lines of the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council," Maoist leader Kishenji told PTI from an undisclosed location. He alleged that the West Bengal government had denied the legitimate rights of the people of the districts. "We demand autonomy to protect the language, culture and religious beliefs of tribals." Asked if he meant statehood, he replied, "the people of the three districts are not yet prepared for statehood."

Queried if it was part of the demand for a 'greater Jharkhand', Kishenji said, "That demand is no longer relevant. The scenario has changed. "Moreover the formation of Jharkhand has not solved any problem.

Tourists leave Darjeeling as Gorkhaland movement gains momentum

Siliguri, 12 December : Hundreds of visitors scrambled to leave the tourist resort of Darjeeling Friday as pro-Gorkhaland activists began a hunger strike and took out rallies in northern West Bengal to push for creation of a separate state.

Youth activists of the Gorkha Janamukti Morcha (GJM) began a hunger strike for what they called indefinite period in the hills and plains of Darjeeling district demanding the creation of a separateGorkhaland state. Their action came a day after the GJM announced massive protests to push for their goal. The activists were spurred with the central nod to a separate Telangana state inAndhra Pradesh.

Tourists began winding their way down the hill resort in cars, jeeps, trekkers and buses and long lines of vehicles could be seen on National Highway 55 that connects Siliguri with Darjeeling. The GJM has announced a four-day shutdown in the hills 14-17 December.

Hill protests spoil year-end holiday

VIVEK CHHETRI, TT, Darjeeling, Dec. 12: Tourists once eager to spend Christmas and the New Year in the hills have started leaving after the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha’s announcement of strikes in the hills demanding statehood.

December does not fall in the regular tourist season in the hills but travellers still reach Darjeeling between December 22 and January 1.

However, after the Morcha started hunger strikes in the hills yesterday and announced a four-day bandh from Monday, tourists like Vinayak Shah from Gujarat do not want to take chances.

“I wasn’t told all liquor shops were shut and now with this tense situation in town, I have decided to cut short my holiday and leave Darjeeling on Sunday,” Shah said.

He barely managed to stay two days, having reached Darjeeling only yesterday.

Some vacationers who don’t want the New Year spirit to get dampened have chosen to go to neighbouring Sikkim or Bhutan.

A hotelier said: “Instead of cancelling their stay, many of my clients are asking us to divert their vacation to Sikkim and also Bhutan if we can.”

Even sudden snowfall, an event coveted by hill tourists, might not be enough of an attraction to keep the tourists this time, the hotelier said.

But a hotel owners’ association that backs the Morcha made it clear that the demand for Gorkhaland took precedence over the need for tourists. “Although there aren’t many tourists now, a strike always affects business. But our priority is the demand for statehood,” said Sangay Tshering Bhutia, president of the Janmukti Hotel Owners’ Association.

The student’s wing of the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha has said its activists will launch hunger strikes from December 19. “If the four-day bandh fails to evoke a positive response from the Centre, the students will take the lead to intensify the agitation,” said Kismat Chhetri, president of the Gorkha Janmukti Vidyarathi Morcha.

“In every statehood agitation, be it for Jharkhand or for Telangana, the students played a major role,” said Keshav Raj Pokhral, general secretary of the Vidyarthi Morcha.

A women’s delegation led by Asha Gurung, wife of Bimal Gurung, left for Delhi today. She will be joined by 70 more members of the Nari Morcha in a relay hunger strike at Jantar Mantar from Monday.

Small needn’t mean beautiful - New states unable to make much headway on social indicators

CHARU SUDAN KASTURI, TT, New Delhi, Dec. 12: Creating smaller states may improve access to infrastructure but there is little statistical evidence to suggest that Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand have outperformed their parent states in social indicators since they were carved out. The governments in India’s three youngest states have improved access to electricity for their people at a far greater rate than their respective parents over the same period of time, according to National Family Health Survey (NFHS) findings. But the three states are yet to prove that their creation has helped improve levels of school education or reduce infant deaths despite a smaller area to govern, the NFHS-2 and NFHS-3 suggest. The relative ease of governing smaller states is frequently used as an argument to carve out new states. The BJP — whose government created Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand — argues that smaller states are likely to witness better development. Small needn’t mean beautiful - New states unable to make much headway on social indicators CHARU SUDAN KASTURI, TT, New Delhi, Dec. 12: Creating smaller states may improve access to infrastructure but there is little statistical evidence to suggest that Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand have outperformed their parent states in social indicators since they were carved out. The governments in India’s three youngest states have improved access to electricity for their people at a far greater rate than their respective parents over the same period of time, according to National Family Health Survey (NFHS) findings. But the three states are yet to prove that their creation has helped improve levels of school education or reduce infant deaths despite a smaller area to govern, the NFHS-2 and NFHS-3 suggest. The relative ease of governing smaller states is frequently used as an argument to carve out new states. The BJP — whose government created Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand — argues that smaller states are likely to witness better development. Small is beautiful ishan joshi, SNS, 13 Dec:We must, the adage goes, change with the times. Being in the happy position of having no political party to be soft on or proprietor’s likes to factor in, there is in this column no topic that’s out-of-bounds ~ within the confines of taste and decency ~ or which cannot be revisited. Yet, there are a handful of issues on which even after 18 years in the news and views business I have found no compelling argument that would prompt a change in position. The need for smaller states in India tops that list. The rash of statehood demands in the aftermath of the Telangana concession have seen a number of interventions on the way forward, as it were. Writing in this newspaper, Rajinder Puri was the first to iterate the demand for a second States Reorganisation Commission to bring to fruition an Indian Union that comprises 50 (or thereabouts) states. The demand for a SRC has found favour with other commentators too including Ramchandra Guha writing in the Hindustan Times the day after Puri in The Statesman. These perfectly logical, cogently argued, commonsense-fuelled interventions that take into account India’s nation-building aspirations and her administrative structures need no endorsement ~ though they have it ~ from this column. No, the concern here, to break the rule of a lifetime of being an extremist but one with no desire to convert others, is to try and convince the nay-sayers that small is indeed beautiful and that too for reasons they themselves may hold dear. The spark for this necessarily foolish endeavour has been the common or garden variety of reaction to the spate of post-Telangana statehood agitations by regular citizens in all walks of life. It has ranged from “oh, Pandora’s Box has been opened,” to “where will this Balkanisation all end,” and “arre, we are all one country and such demands divide us,” to the safest fallback of the unthinking ~ “the real issues are being ignored.” To understand these reactions, the context in and from which they emanate needs a quick dekko. Those with India’s interests at heart even if members of the no-smaller states school of thought have had as a central theme, though not always publicly articulated, an argument which runs along the lines: Why leave the people of, say Gorkhaland or Bundelkhand or xyz, to the whimsical governance of local tyrants? In this stand are strains of the political-bureaucratic consensus of the early Post-Independence decades that held, perhaps rightly to a large extent, that for all its sins, the Central leadership was not as despotic, pelf-seeking, corrupt, or just plain grubby or hostage to a feudal-medieval mindset as regional chieftains. What the inheritors of this consensus ought to have realised, however, is that they were probably right but only till a given point in time. Till then they did, to the best of their ability in the main, manage the holding operation. And it is indeed in some ways their success in tempering local traditions with prevailing notions of modernity ~ right or wrong is a debate for elsewhere ~ Constitutionalism and good governance that has led to the emergence of groups of statehood seekers who are articulate and confident enough to insist that the apron strings now be loosened. But instead of recognising this categorical imperative and acknowledging the changing empirical reality wherein the demand for statehood was no longer susceptible to being dismissed as a primordial impulse being articulated by those on the make (though some of those who did and do so even now could certainly be; on the make or, Koda-like, on the take), the attempt was to co-opt them into power-sharing. Such a process naturally created a new elite from the various regions now demanding statehood, which in fact was many a times just a political system sanctioned morphing of the traditional elite, both at the provincial i.e. state and the Central level. And this trend coincided with the progressive deterioration of the quality of governance dispensed through Central administrative structures of the all-India kind. In this mix, over the next three to four decades till today, throw in the aspirational element of local populations, with their imagined communities seeking a state ~ and stake ~ within the Indian Union, in which developmental, ethnic, cultural, linguistic and other markers are subsumed. It’s only a state of their own, given the political-administrative system in India, that provides these citizens both substantive powers and visible symbolic representation of these varied impulses. With the twin proviso that (a) the new states, whatever the basis of their sense of separateness and these will differ from region to region as one size does not fit all, ensure the Constitution of India, the rule of law and no discrimination prevails within their boundaries and (ii) the Centre holds, which is to say focuses on its interventionist role with more conceptual clarity, moral authority and political credibility to neuter rogue states whilst building a pan-Indian administrative structure charged with providing good governance and protected ferociously in the discharge of its duties. Ironically, if aptly, it is the argument used by those opposed to the creation of new states ~ the desire to give all Indians access to better and more sensitive governance ~ that is proving to be the game-changer. As to where it will all end, hell ~ I hope in more powers within each of the proposed 50 or so states to village panchayats and town halls. This is also, incidentally, known as self-governance. And married to self-restraint, it may even prove to be a game-winner. For India. GNLF, AIGL ask GJMM to observe strike, not compromise SNS, SILIGURI, 11 DEC: With the GJMM launching its declared hunger strike today for Gorkhaland, the GNLF and the All India Gorkha League leadership demanded the GJMM leaders to sit for the fast exercise instead of pressing others in action. According to the GNLF and AIGL leadership, that would lend credence to the on-going movement. According to the Panighatta-based GNLF leader, Mr Rajen Mukhia, the GJMM leaders should have participated in the hunger strike themselves. “We fail to understand why the self- styled statehood champions have chosen to involve some youth and women in the fast unto death movement. Why are they staying away from the fast themselves and merely indulging in ineffectual bluster? We doubt if the strategy would pay dividends,” said the controversial GNLF leader. Branding the present phase of agitation in the hills and elsewhere in the country for Gorkhaland as an “eye wash,” the AIGL president Mr Madan Tamang said that the GJMM leaders should have followed in the footsteps of the Telangana protagonists instead. “It sounds ludicrous that some youth have launched the fast unto death agitation for the avowed goal while the leaders are merely verbose. This is not the proper way to accelerate things in the desired direction at this monumental juncture,” he commented. Contrasting the Telangana movement with the present phase of the statehood movement in the Darjeeling hills, the controversial AIGL leader said that the Telangana leadership looked more serious than the GJMM leaders. “The supreme Telangana leader was on an indefinite fast himself, which resulted in the nation-wide political uproar. Around 80 persons sacrificed themselves through self-immolation to intensify the statehood movement over the years. By way contrast, the GJMM leaders appear shy of fasting themselves, involving innocent youth and women in the show. This smacks of cavalier casualness on the part of the GJMM leadership,” Mr Tamang said. Meanwhile, to lend further punch to the ongoing statehood movement, the Communist Party Revolutionary Marxist has sent a memorandum to the Prime Minister and the Union home minister asking them to immediately initiate steps to resolve the long-standing Gorkhaland logjam. “History testifies that the Gorkhaland movement dates back a century and the self-determination aspiration grows from strength to strength with passing time. It can no longer be brushed under the carpet,” the CPRM leader Mr R B Rai said. Commenting on the agitation, the GJMM media secretary, Dr Harka Bahadur Chhetri said that their fasting movement would continue till the Centre initiated concrete measures to resolve the long-enduring imbroglio. “The movement, though continuing in the desired direction till now, is full of imponderables though,” Dr Chhetri commented. Acid test for GJMM, says GNLF after Telangana decision Sudipta Chanda, SNS, SILIGURI, 11 DEC: The Telangana development has provided an impetus to the flagging Gorkhaland movement. With the original Gorkhaland protagonists the GNLF out of the game, the Gorkha Jan Mukti Morcha, which is now spearheading the show, has decided to redraw the battle lines on the issue. And, it is being claimed the 21 December tripartite talks have now turned inconsequential. The parallel is questionable, for what has the realisation or abortion of the Telangana demand got to do with Gorkhaland? If the Centre's admitting Telangana bolsters the Gorkhaland claim, scuttling of the Telangana demand should by that same logic sideline the Gorkhaland demand, many would say. The Gorkhaland demand by its own right has a basis. It is therefore debatable if encouragement or frustration should be allowed to influence the Gorkhaland demand on the basis of what happens to the Telangana demand. Moreover, the Telangana issue is far from clinched. The GJMM leadership's writing off the 21 December proposed tripartite talks as insignificant at this juncture therefore looks premature. It would be interesting to observe what stand the GJMM takes on 21 December. The Andhra Pradesh development has, however, bought the GJMM a fresh lease of life. The Hill-based organisation, which was going slow for a variety of reasons, has declared another round of ‘Stayagraha’ (read pressure tactics) in support of its demand, which is an acceptable democratic exercise. The sting, as usual, is in the tail. If the sudden turn of events has helped revitalize the GJMM organs, those opposed to the Gorkhaland demand has also received a shot in the arm. The plains-based anti-Gorkhaland pressure groups have raised the ante against the GJMM and other pro-Gorkhaland but anti-GJMM organisations from the Darjeeling hills like the GNLF and some newly floated platforms are sparing no effort to project the situation is an acid test for the GJMM. ABAVP to wait & watch over Gorkhaland demand SNS, JALPAIGURI, 11 DEC: Wary of the GJMM movement for Gorkhaland in what they consider as their territory, the Akhil Bhartiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad leadership has decided to adopt a wait and watch policy for now. As part of a declared programme, GJMM supporters including seven women today began an indefinite hunger at Kalchini in Jalpaiguri district in addition to several spots in Darjeeling district. “The GJMM, however, does not want any confrontation with the ABAVP,” said its East Dooars Committee convener Mr Ashok Lama. “The Centre has taken a positive stand regarding the Telangana state demand. We feel, the Centre should also consider the demand of Gorkhaland in that same light. In addition to the hunger strike programme, we would also organize rallies all over the Dooars from 14 December to 17 December. Our high command has decided to go for a shut down in the hills during those three days but we would not do that in the Dooars,” said Mr Lama. Commenting on the GJMM movement, the ABAVP leadership said they would not sacrifice an inch of land from the Dooars. “There is no question of letting up our territory. For now we would watch which way the wind blows and then decided our course of action,” said the ABAVP state president Mr Birsha Tirkey. According to the ABAVP Dooars Terai Regional Unit secretary Mr Rajesh Lakra, they had convened a meeting on 16 December to discuss the political situation in the Dooars. “We would organize an Adivasi convention at Meteli on 20 December and our national president Mr Sanjibhai Damur would attend the convention. We would discuss our role vis a vis the GJMM movement in the Dooars in the meeting. Although we are not taking a confrontationist stand right away, active resistance cannot be ruled out in future,” he said. The ABAVP Dooars Terai regional unit president Mr John Barla stated that the district administration should immediately intervene in the matter or it could lead to an unsavoury situation. “If any law and order problem arises out of the ongoing movement, the ABAVP would not take responsibility,” Mr Barla threatened. The Jalpaiguri SP Mr Anand Kumar assured that the district administration was keeping a close watch on the GJMM movement. GJMM begins hunger-strike in Hills SNS, SILIGURI, 11 DEC: The Gorkha Jan Mukti Morcha (GJMM) convened fast-unto-death agitation for a separate Gorkhaland state today began amid a lukewarm response. A total of 89 activists today sat in for the indefinite fast at Darjeeling, Kurseong, Kalimpong, Kalchini and Dagapur near Siliguri town, in place of the 105 fasters that the GJMM chief Mr Bimal Gurung had announced yesterday. Moreover, the fasting agitation commenced at around 12:30 pm, by a delay of over an hour from the scheduled time of 11:19 am. In the district headquarters of Darjeeling town, only 14 activists joined the fast, while at Dagapur (Siliguri) the number stood at 12. Kurseong, Kalimpong and Kalchini in the Dooars, however, fulfilled the actual target of 21 fasters each, as was announced by the party leadership. But denying reading much into the deviations, the GJMM central committee member Mr Amar Lama attributed this to late announcement of the agitation yesterday. “The agitation was announced quite late in the afternoon and hence, our volunteers faced some difficulty in starting the agitation on time today. As far as the number of fasters is concerned, more individuals would join in tomorrow,” Mr Lama said. Meanwhile, the party delegation led by general secretary Mr Roshan Giri, which flew off to New Delhi yesterday, has reportedly met the Union home minister Mr P Chidambarm today. “Accompanied by our Darjeeling MP Mr Jaswant Singh, the delegation met the home minister and urged him to come up with a positive announcement on Gorkhaland as was done in case of Telangana. “After all, there cannot be two yardsticks for the citizens of India hailing from two separate regions,” said the GJMM spokesperson Mr Harkabahadur Cheetri. Mr Cheetri also clarified that his party would go ahead with the scheduled bandh in Darjeeling Hills from 14 - 17 December, unless there was some positive gesture from the Union government. àYmZ‘ÝÌrbmB© ^mJmon-H$mo {MÆ>r Z¶m± {X„r 12 {Xgå~a… ^maVH$m ~mBgdQ>m amÁ¶‘m AmâZm emImhê$ JR>Z J[agHo$H$mo gd©^maVr¶ ñVaH$mo g“R>Z ^maVr¶ JmoIm© n[ag§Kbo XoeH$m àYmZ‘ÝÌrbmB© nÌ nR>mEa ¶ynrE gaH$mabo Vob§JmZm amÁ¶ JR>Z JZ} {df¶‘m {bEH$mo {ZU©¶H$mo ñdmJV OZmEH$mo N>& Cº$ nÌ‘m ^mJmon-bo àYmZ‘ÝÌrbmB© XrK© {XZXo{I bpå~V JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo ‘mJ‘m{W n{Z {dMma JZ} AZwamoY JX£ ¶mo ‘mJ Vob§JmZmH$mo ‘wÔm ^ÝXm n{Z nwamZmo ahoH$mo Xm~r JaoH$mo N>& ¶ynrE gaH$mabo {bEH$mo {ZU©¶H$mo H$maU ^maVH$m OZVm‘m ahoH$mo àOmVÝÌ‘m{WH$mo AmñWm a {dídmg AP Xmoã~a ^Ea ~‹T>oH$mo ~VmC±X¡ nÌ‘m ^mJmon-bo XoeH$mo ECQ>m B‘mZXma a amï´>^º$ Om{V JmoIm©hê$bo ^maVdf©H$mo àJ{VH$mo {ZpåV nwè¶mEH$mo ¶moJXmZH$mo n{Z C„oI JaoH$mo N>& nÌ‘m JmoIm©hê$bo ¶mo XoeH$mo ñdmYrZVm gL²>J«m‘H$mo Ad{Y‘m C„oI¶mo½¶ ¶moJXmZ nwè¶mEa AmâZmo àmU ݶm¡N>mda JaoH$mo CXmhaU noe JX£ ñdmYrZVmníMmV² n{Z gr‘majmXo{I {bEa AmÝV[aH$ gwajmH$mo joÌ‘m ¶mo Om{Vbo bJmVma àmUH$mo ~mOr bJmEa XoeH$m eÌwhê${gV gL²>Kf© J[aahoH$mo A{Z àemgZ, ZmJ[aH$ godm, amOZr{V, IobHy$X, {ejm, gm{h˶, g§ñH¥${V Am{XH$mo {dH$mgH$mo {ZpåV n{Z JmoIm©hê$bo {ZñdmW© ^mdbo H$m¶© J[aahoH$mo Xm~r J[aEH$mo N>& ¶Ú{n na‘² amï´>^º$ JmoIm© Om{Vbo nwè¶mEH$mo ¶moJXmZbmB© Am±IrAmoPob JX£ AÚmd{Y ¶g Om{VbmB© ~wPoa dm A~wP ^Ea ~{hamJV, {dXoer, Aàdmgr A{Z Zonmbr‘ybH$mo ^Þo bmÄN>Zm bJmCZo H$m¶© ^BahoH$mo C„oI JX£ nÌ‘m ^mJmon-bo ¶mo Om{Vbo ¶g nr‹S>m~mQ> ‘w{º$ nmCZw hmo ^Zo AmâZmo ^maVr¶VmH$mo n[aM¶ H$m¶‘ hþZ Amdí¶H$ ahoH$mo ~VmBEH$mo N> A{Z ¶gH$mo {ZpåV gd©{ZåZ àemg{ZH$ {ZH$m¶ AWdm AbJ amÁ¶ JR>Z J[aZwnZ} Amdí¶H$Vm gaH$mabo ~moY JZ©wnZ} OZmBEH$mo N>& ^mJmon-bo ¶ñV¡ AmYmahê$bmB© {bEa gZ² 2006-Xo{I Z¡ XoeH$m {ef©ñW ZoV¥d¥ÝX{gV ^oQ>KmQ> JZ} H«$‘ ewé JaoH$mo ~VmC±X¡ nÌ‘m AmOgå‘ XoeH$m amï´>n{V, àYmZ‘ÝÌr, ¶ynrE Aܶj, {dnjr ZoVm bJm¶V XoeH$m à~wÕ amOZr{VH$ AmohmoXmH$m ZoV¥d¥ÝXbmB© Xoe^[aH$m JmoIm©hê$H$mo N>mVm gL²>JR>Zbo nÌmMma J[agHo$ Vmn{Z ¶g~mao g‘w{MV nhb Z^EH$mo nÌ‘m ~VmBEH$mo N>& nÌ‘m JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo ‘mJ gmam ^maV‘m N>[aEH$m EH$ H$amo‹S>^ÝXm A{YH$ JmoIm©hê$H$mo am{ï´>¶ {M•marH$mo àíZ hmo ^Þo Xm~r JX£ ¶gbmB© gaH$mabo XmOu{bL> a ~“mb amÁ¶{^ÌH$mo joÌr¶ g‘ñ¶mH$mo ê$n‘m ‘mÌ J«hU JZ© ZhþZo ~VmBEH$mo N> A{Z ¶Ú{n, hmb‘m ¶g ‘mJH$mo nj‘m XmOu{bL> nhm‹S>H$m Am‘‘m{Zghê$bo YaZm, Am‘aU ^moH$ h‹S>Vmb, ~ÝX OñVm àOmVmpÝÌH$ AmÝXmobZ Ma‘Mwbr‘m nwJoH$mo Xm~r JX£ ^mJmon-bo AmâZmo nÌ‘m XmOu{bL>H$m JmoIm©hê$bo J[aahoH$mo bmoH$VmpÝÌH$ OZmÝXmobZà{V Xoe^[aH$m JmoIm©hê$H$mo g‘W©Z a gh¶moJ ahoH$mo n{Z ~VmEH$mo N>& ^mJmon-bo ~VmEAZwgma, AbJ amÁ¶ JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo JR>Z XmOu{bL>‘m hþ±Xm Xoe^[aH$m JmoIm©hê$bo Am’y$bmB© ^maVr¶ JmoIm©H$mo ê$n‘m n[a{MV JamCZo Adga nmCZoN>Z² A{Z Cº$ n[aM¶H$mo gL²>H$Q> Xÿa hþ±Xm ¶mo Xoebo JmoIm© Om{V~mQ> AP Xmoã~a ê$n‘m ¶moJXmZ nmCZoN>&  ^mJmon-H$mo {‘{S>¶m gob Z¶m± {X„r~mQ> Omar {dk{á& JmoO‘w‘mo-bmB© Am{Xdmgr {dH$mg n[afX²H$mo MwZm¡Vr H$m{b‘ݶyO… XmOu{bL>, VamB© a Sw>Ag© {‘bmEa AbJ amÁ¶ JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo JR>Z J[aZwnZ} ‘mJbmB© à~b ê$n‘m CR>mZ J[aahoH$mo nhm‹S>H$mo amOZr{VH$ Xb JmoIm© OZ‘w{º$ ‘moMm©bmB© Sw>Ag©H$mo AH$m} à^mdH$mar J¡a-amOZ¡{VH$ gL²>JR>Z A{Ib ^maVr¶ Am{Xdmgr {dH$mg n[afX²bo MwZm¡Vr {X±X¡ JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo ‘mJH$mo AmÝXmobZbmB© XmOu{bL> nhm‹S>‘¡ gr{‘V am»Zo YåH$s {XEH$mo N>& Am{dn-bo JmoO‘w‘mo-bo AmâZmo AmÝXmobZH$mo n[a{YbmB© {dñVma Jaoa Sw>Ag© a VamB©{Va ~‹T>mEH$mo IÊS>‘m ¶gH$mo n[aUm‘ ^¶mZH$ hþZo MwZm¡Vr {XEH$mo N>& am{ï´>¶ g‘mMma ‘mܶ‘hê$‘m àH$m{eV I~ahê$AZwgma, A{^Am{dn-H$mo ~L²>Jmb À¶mßQ>aH$m Aܶj {~agm {VH}$bo JUVmpÝÌH$ Xoe‘m AmÝXmobZ JZ} A{YH$ma g~¡H$mo ahoH$mo ~VmC±X¡ ¶Ú{n JmoO‘w‘mo-bo O~gå‘ AmâZmo AmÝXmobZbmB© VamB© a Sw>Ag©‘m {^ͶmC±X¡Z V~gå‘ Hw$Z¡ àH$maH$mo à{VH$ma ZJ[aZo OZmEH$m N>Z²& CZbo g§dmXXmVmhê$bmB© Sw>Ag© a VamB©bmB© àñVm{dV JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>H$mo {hñgm Z~ZmBZo ~VmC±X¡ Am{Xdmgrhê$H$mo AmâZ¡ OZmH$m§jm ahoH$mo Xm~r JaoH$m N>Z²& AH$m©{Va JmoO‘w‘mo-H$m Sw>Ag© à^mar gm‘wEb JwéL>bo JmoO‘w‘mo-bo bmoH$VmpÝÌH$ T>“‘m AmâZmo AmÝXmobZbmB© Sw>Ag©‘m ‘mÌ hmoBZ gmam ^maV‘m n{Z Am¶moOZm JZ© g³Zo j‘Vm amIoH$mo Xm~r JX£ Sw>Ag©‘m JmoIm©hê$^ÝXm A{YH$ ‘mÌm‘m Am{Xdmgrhê$ amÁ¶ gaH$ma a Ho$ÝÐ gaH$maH$mo EH$nmIo Zr{VÛmam {npëgEH$mo ~VmEH$m N>Z²& CZbo H${Vn¶ ñdmWu Am{Xdmgr VÎdhê$bo ~L²>Jmb gaH$maH$mo nj‘m bmJoa JmoIm© a Am{Xdmgrhê$bo empÝVnyd©H$ ê$n‘m gånÞ J[aahoH$mo OZAmÝXmobZH$mo {damoY J[aahoH$mo ~VmC±X¡ CZbo Va ¶g {H${g‘H$m ZoVmhê$‘m n{Z EH$ {XZ Adí¶¡ gX²~w{Õ nbmCZo {dMma nmoIoH$m N>Z²& ¶g¡~rM CZbo Sw>Ag©H$mo H$mb{MZr‘m Am‘aU AZeZ empÝVnyd©H$ gånÞ ^BahoH$mo OmZH$mar {X±X¡ AmÝXmobZH$marhê$H$mo ‘Zmo~b d¥{Õ JamCZH$m bm{J ñWmZr¶ JmoIm© A{Z Am{Xdmgr g‘wXm¶H$m JmoIm©ë¶mÊS>ào‘r OZVmbo AZgZ ñWbH$mo bJmVma ^«‘U J[aahoH$mo n{Z ~VmEH$m N>Z²& AH$m}{Va, AmJm‘r 16 {Xgå~aH$m {XZ ZdJ{R>V A^mAm{dn-H$mo Sw>Ag©-VamB© emImbo JmoIm©ë¶mÊS> {df¶‘m{W ECQ>m ~¡R>H$ S>mHo$H$mo OmZH$mar nmBEH$mo N>& ¶g¡ g§JR>Zbo 20 {Xgå~aH$m {XZ ‘Q>obr‘m ECQ>m {damQ²> è¶mbrH$mo Am¶moOZm JZ} {ZYmo JaoH$mo N> A{Z Cº$ è¶mbrbmB© g§JR>ZH$m A{Ib ^maVr¶ Aܶj gOr^mB Xm‘wabo n{Z gå~moYZ JZ} ~VmBEH$mo N>&(H$m{b‘ݶyO)